Skip to content
English
Go to jmrodgers.com
  • There are no suggestions because the search field is empty.

What Are the Different Types of Duty Drawback?

An overview of the primary duty drawback provisions under 19 U.S.C. § 1313 and the transaction types each provision is designed to address.

Duty drawback is not a single type of claim. U.S. law provides several drawback provisions that apply to different import, manufacturing, export, return, and destruction scenarios.

The primary categories include manufacturing drawback, unused merchandise drawback, rejected merchandise drawback, and finished petroleum derivatives drawback. Within manufacturing and unused merchandise drawback, claims may also use direct identification or substitution methodologies when the applicable requirements are met.

Manufacturing Drawback

Manufacturing drawback applies when imported duty-paid merchandise, or qualifying substitute merchandise, is used to manufacture or produce articles in the United States that are subsequently exported or destroyed.

Manufacturing drawback is primarily governed by 19 U.S.C. § 1313(a) and (b).

Direct Identification Manufacturing Drawback

Direct Identification Manufacturing Drawback under 19 U.S.C. § 1313(a) applies when imported duty-paid merchandise is used in the manufacture or production of qualifying articles in the United States.

The imported merchandise used in production must be identified and supported through the company's records and applicable drawback accounting methodology.

This approach may be appropriate when a company can establish a direct relationship between imported merchandise, manufacturing activity, and the resulting exported or destroyed articles.

Substitution Manufacturing Drawback

Substitution Manufacturing Drawback under 19 U.S.C. § 1313(b) allows qualifying substitute merchandise to be used in manufacturing instead of requiring the actual imported merchandise to be incorporated into the exported or destroyed article.

Under the current statute, substitution generally relies on merchandise classified under the same 8-digit Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) subheading as the designated imported merchandise, subject to additional statutory requirements and exceptions.

Substitution can create significant flexibility for manufacturers that use interchangeable imported and domestic materials or components in their production processes.

For a more detailed comparison, see Manufacturing Drawback: Substitution vs. Direct Identification.

Unused Merchandise Drawback

Unused Merchandise Drawback applies when qualifying merchandise is exported or destroyed without being used in the United States.

It is primarily governed by 19 U.S.C. § 1313(j) and may be claimed using either direct identification or substitution methodologies.

Merchandise does not necessarily have to remain completely unchanged to qualify as unused. Certain activities, including testing, cleaning, repacking, inspecting, sorting, refurbishing, repairing, relabeling, and similar operations, do not necessarily constitute use if they do not amount to manufacture or production for drawback purposes.

Direct Identification Unused Merchandise Drawback

Direct Identification Unused Merchandise Drawback under 19 U.S.C. § 1313(j)(1) applies when qualifying imported duty-paid merchandise is identified and subsequently exported or destroyed without being used in the United States.

This methodology requires records capable of establishing the relationship between the imported merchandise and the merchandise that is ultimately exported or destroyed.

Substitution Unused Merchandise Drawback

Substitution Unused Merchandise Drawback under 19 U.S.C. § 1313(j)(2) allows qualifying merchandise to be substituted for the imported merchandise rather than requiring exportation or destruction of the actual imported units.

The substituted merchandise must satisfy the applicable classification, possession, timing, and documentation requirements.

For more information, see Unused Merchandise Drawback Explained.

Rejected Merchandise Drawback

Rejected Merchandise Drawback is primarily governed by 19 U.S.C. § 1313(c).

It may apply to qualifying imported merchandise that:

  • Does not conform to sample or specifications
  • Was shipped without the consignee's consent
  • Was defective at the time of importation
  • Meets certain statutory requirements involving merchandise sold at retail and subsequently returned and accepted

Qualifying rejected merchandise must also satisfy the applicable exportation or destruction and timing requirements.

Rejected Merchandise Drawback can be particularly relevant when imported products are defective, nonconforming, incorrectly shipped, or otherwise unsuitable for their intended purpose, but the specific facts must be evaluated against the statutory requirements.

Finished Petroleum Derivatives Drawback

Finished Petroleum Derivatives Drawback is governed primarily by 19 U.S.C. § 1313(p).

This specialized provision allows drawback involving certain qualified petroleum derivatives and related exported articles when the specific statutory requirements are satisfied.

The rules address factors such as qualifying products, manufacturing or import activity, the relationship between qualified and exported articles, quantities, records, and claimant requirements. Because these provisions differ from many traditional manufacturing and unused merchandise claims, petroleum drawback programs require careful product classification and transaction analysis.

Can Destroyed Merchandise Qualify for Duty Drawback?

Yes. Merchandise does not always have to be exported to support a duty drawback claim.

Under several drawback provisions, qualifying merchandise or manufactured articles may instead be destroyed under applicable CBP requirements. Destruction can potentially support claims involving:

  • Manufacturing Drawback
  • Unused Merchandise Drawback
  • Rejected Merchandise Drawback

For this reason, "Destruction Drawback" is better understood as a potential qualifying disposition under multiple drawback provisions rather than as a separate statutory category of drawback.

The applicable procedures must be followed so that the destruction can be properly established for drawback purposes. CBP has emphasized that destruction claims must satisfy the applicable supervision and evidentiary requirements.

How Do You Determine Which Type of Duty Drawback Applies?

Determining the appropriate drawback provision begins with understanding how merchandise moves through the company's supply chain.

Important questions include:

  • Was imported merchandise used in U.S. manufacturing or production?
  • Was merchandise exported or destroyed without being used in the United States?
  • Was imported merchandise defective, nonconforming, shipped without consent, or otherwise potentially eligible as rejected merchandise?
  • Is direct identification practical, or could a substitution methodology apply?
  • Does the merchandise fall within the specialized petroleum drawback provisions?
  • Who imported, purchased, manufactured, transferred, exported, or destroyed the merchandise?
  • Can the required import, manufacturing, transfer, export, and destruction records be established?

A company may also have opportunities under more than one drawback provision depending on its products and supply-chain activity.

The objective is not simply to select the claim type that appears to provide the largest refund. The selected provision and methodology must accurately reflect the underlying transactions and be supported by the required records.

How Does J.M. Rodgers Determine the Appropriate Drawback Methodology?

J.M. Rodgers evaluates each client's import, export, manufacturing, product, and supply-chain activity to identify potential drawback opportunities and determine which methodologies may be appropriate.

The review may include:

  • Import and export data analysis
  • Manufacturing and bill-of-material review
  • Product classification analysis
  • Direct identification and substitution opportunities
  • Domestic supplier and downstream customer activity
  • Available records and data systems
  • Potential recovery under multiple drawback provisions

 J.M. Rodgers combines experienced drawback specialists with proprietary in-house drawback technology to support complex drawback programs, ongoing claim processing, and compliance-focused administration.

For additional information about J.M. Rodgers' approach, see How J.M. Rodgers Maximizes Duty Drawback Refunds.

Next Steps

If your company pays U.S. duties or tariffs and exports merchandise, manufactures exported products, purchases duty-paid merchandise domestically, or has merchandise that is exported or destroyed, more than one type of duty drawback may need to be evaluated.

J.M. Rodgers can review your import, export, manufacturing, and supply-chain activity to identify potential drawback opportunities and determine which methodology may be appropriate for your business.

Disclaimer

This information is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. Duty drawback eligibility, claim type, methodology, and refund amounts depend on the specific merchandise, transactions, documentation, applicable tariff treatment, and regulatory requirements associated with each claim.